California Online Poker Bill Sees Reggie Jones-Sawyer Heat Up to PokerStars Possibility



California State Assemblyman Reggie Jones-Sawyer, whose new online poker bill is far more comprehensive than previous drafts, would welcome racetracks and PokerStars into the Golden State video gaming market as well.

A California that is new online bill, sponsored by State Assemblyman Reggie Jones-Sawyer (D-Los Angeles), is now on the table to oppose the bill introduced by fellow State Assemblyman Mike Gatto in December.

The Sawyer-Jones bill, AB 167, seeks to determine ‘a proper structure that is regulatory place that provides safe and compliant internet poker access,’ the assemblyman announced yesterday.

So how do the two bills that are new? And more to the point, how does the Jones-Sawyer that is new bill with his past bill, AB2291, which foundered regarding the rocks of last year’s legislative session?

No Bad Actors

Jones-Sawyer said by the end of the 2014 session that the new, revised bill would be a high concern for 2015, and indicated that this time, the ‘bad actor’ language is softened. The non-severable bad actor clauses of AB229 shown to be always a sticking point for stakeholders, and caused an important schism between those who wanted PokerStars in the marketplace and those who didn’t.

As expected, AB 167 seems to possess removed those bad star provisions, apparently clearing the method for PokerStars to enter a regulated California market. Those precluded from applying for a on-line poker license, states the bill, include:

‘The individual [who] has contemptuously defied an investigative that is legislative, or other formal investigative body of a state or regarding the united states of america or a foreign jurisdiction, when that body is engaged within the investigation of crimes relating to poker, official corruption associated to poker activities, or unlawful profiteering activity or organized crime, as defined in part l 86.2 of the Penal Code.’

The bill continues to clarify a position that is key could straight affect PokerStars possible entry into the Golden State market, given its previously vilified owners vs. its brand new, ‘clean slate’ ones.

‘ The person [who] has been convicted in a court of competent jurisdiction of a felony consisting of either having accepted a bet over the Internet in violation of United States or California law, or having abetted or aided that unlawful task.’

Note the use associated with word ‘person,’ which suggests that PokerStars, by divesting itself of its previous owners, against whom there were DOJ that is outstanding, would manage to take part in the California online market unscathed.

Anti-PokerStars Coalition Denounces Language

The language is in sharp contrast with that of final year’s bill from Jones-Sawyer, which proposed to exclude ‘any brand name or company name, including any derivative manufacturer with the same or similar wording, or any trade or solution mark, computer software, technology, functional system, customer information, or other data acquired, derived, or developed directly or indirectly from any operation that has accepted a bet or engaged in a financial deal linked to such bet from any person in the United States on any kind of Web gaming after December 31, 2006.’

If Jones-Sawyer believes his bill will sail through with the backing associated with the stakeholders, however, he has another think coming, as the anti-PokerStars coalition that is tribal no time in denouncing this language.

‘There is much for tribes to dislike concerning this bill,’ said Pechanga Chairman Mark Macarro. ‘We are disappointed that the bill disregards important principles from a broad coalition of respected tribes and card rooms that help prevent corporations and entities that previously violated law that is federal profiting from tainted software, brands, and databases derived from illegal activity.’

Photo Finish for Racetracks and Liquidity

Other major news for AB 167 could be the inclusion of California racetracks in a post-regulation landscape, which many felt had been unjustly ignored by previous bills. The sharing of liquidity along with other states, expressly forbidden in preceding draft bills, appears to be on the menu this time, and there is additionally a suggestion that players on unlicensed sites could be prosecuted.

The permit fee would cost $10 million, with a tax-rate set at 8.5 percent of gross video gaming revenue. As soon as language has been agreed upon, the bill shall require two-thirds for the vote to pass.

New Bill Would Decriminalize Fantasy Sports in Washington

State Senator Pam Roach introduced a bill that will legalize fantasy activities games in the state of Washington. (Image: PamRoach.com)

Their state of Washington is known for having some of the harshest online gambling laws in the United States.

But these laws go even more than numerous realize: Washington also considers fantasy sports to be considered a form of gambling, and thus players who spend money on their online fantasy sports leagues are technically breaking the law, and could even be charged with a felony beneath the same laws that criminalize online poker and casino games.

That’s something which numerous local officials would like to be changed.

With an estimated 500,000 residents in the state playing fantasy sports games, State Senator Pam Roach (R-31st District) says it’s time and energy to reclassify the contests as a game of skill instead than as luck-based gambling.

‘Our state sees fantasy football as being a game of chance a felony criminal activity,’ Roach said. ‘Congress has long considered fantasy football become a casino game of ability. My bill will change the state’s definition.’

Washington Residents Restricted from Fantasy Sports Sites

Now, numerous major fantasy that is online outlets block Washington residents from participating on their sites, including top daily dream sites like FanDuel and DraftKings.

Traditional season leagues that are long web sites like ESPN.com are frequently available to Washington residents, however they are typically ineligible to win awards.

The issue is that many states see fantasy activities as a game of skill.

Nevertheless the Washington State Gambling Commission still views luck being a big factor that is enough classify it as gambling under present state laws.

‘There’s constantly the chance the Seattle Seahawks will come back from two touchdowns down with two minutes left,’ stated commission chairman Chris Stearns, talking about the Seahawks’ improbable comeback in the NFC Championship game weekend that is last. ‘Whereas in many ladbrokes casino slot machine states, the proven fact that you have invested all this time poring over stats and making your own spreadsheets, that’s the skill part, and that weighs most greatly.’

Sports Betting Would Remain Illegal

Beneath the proposed law, there would still be a prohibition on placing bets on the result of real life sporting events.

Nonetheless, both day-to-day and fantasy that is season-long would be expressly appropriate, even for real money play.

The bill seemingly have better odds than a bill that is similar would decriminalize and regulate online poker; the fantasy sports bill has bi-partisan support and has now picked up lots of sponsors on both edges of the aisle.

Companion bills have been completely introduced in both the House of Representatives and the State Senate.

The Fantasy supports the legalization effort Sports Trade Association, a business group based out of Chicago.

According to the combined group, more than 41 million people in America and Canada play fantasy sports, and nearly half of them play for real cash.

‘We think citizens of Washington ought to be in a position to play the full array of fantasy sports contests offered in 45 other states and start to become able to win prizes in free contests offered by major media organizations,’ said association president Peter Schoenke in a statement.

Washington is one of five states in which residents are typically obstructed from playing on day-to-day dream sports sites.

Even as we recently reported, energy is increasing in several of these states to legalize such games: recently, a Montana lawmaker introduced a bill that would allow residents to take part in contests where the entry fee had been $100 or less.

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker Rejects Kenosha Casino Project

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker has rejected a proposed casino in Kenosha, with some saying the move may be related to his presidential aspirations. (Image: Wikimedia Commons)

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker has put the kibosh on a proposed casino plan, saying that building the venue would be too costly simply to taxpayers to be allowed.

In a declaration, Walker said that the state has been liable for up to $100 million towards the Potawatomi tribe, which has a casino in Milwaukee, as a result of agreements between your tribe and their state.

The agreement between Wisconsin and the Potawatomi tribe, the state is responsible for reimbursing the tribe for any revenue lost to other casinos that open in the state under the compact that governs.

‘After a comprehensive review of the potential economic impact of the proposed Kenosha casino project, the danger to the state’s taxpayers is too great,’ Walker stated in a statement. ‘Due to the compacts negotiated by Governor Doyle, the current expense to taxpayers of approving the proposed casino project is up to $100 million therefore the long-term economic hit to the state budget would be a potential loss of vast sums of dollars.’

The casino that is new which would have price about $800 million to build, would be to be considered a joint venture between the Menominee Tribe and rough Rock, which may have been accountable for operating the casino. The project was approved in 2013 by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, however it still needed approval through the governor of Wisconsin before it could go forward.

Casino Supporters See Politics Behind Decision

While Walker said the rejection was a method to protect residents of the state from a financial obligation, the Menominee Tribe saw other motivations behind his decision.

‘One tribe, the Forest County Potawatomi and one goal of Governor Walker, the presidency, has resulted in a ‘no’ for our people,’ the tribe stated in a declaration.

Many political observers believe that Walker could be arranging a run at the Republican nomination for the presidency in 2016. The Menominee statement suggested that Walker’s decision was made to placate conservatives that are opposed to casino gambling. One Iowa that is prominent conservative Tom Coates, recently had written a letter to Walker urging him to reject the casino. That page was also signed by 600 caucus that is potential from Iowa.

Regardless of motivation behind Walker’s decision, many locals in Kenosha had been disappointed in your decision.

‘ There were people ready to down go to work here, and that is maybe not going to happen now,’ Kenosha Mayor Keith Bosman told WTMJ.

With Kenosha Out of the real Way, Beloit Hopes for Federal Attention

It’s feasible that Kenosha’s loss could be Beloit’s gain. Supporters of a Ho-Chunk Nation casino into the city hope that the rejection associated with Menominee casino could suggest that their project will now pass through federal review more quickly.

The city and the tribe experienced a preliminary deal in place since 2012, but officials say they were told that the Bureau of Indian Affairs were delaying a decision in part because of the Kenosha proposal. The Ho-Chunk were publicly in opposition to the Kenosha project.

Regardless of the rejection, however, the Menominee say they shall soldier on.

‘We must remember all of the Menominee Nation has overcome much more than 10,000 years,’ the tribe said in a statement. ‘ We are going to continue to flourish as a country and will continue to be partners that are honorable Indian Tribes in Wisconsin and around the world.’

Lascia un Commento

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *

È possibile utilizzare questi tag ed attributi XHTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>